Archive for the 'Books' Category

A new republic!

March 14, 2008

images-1.jpeg Prepping (read that “desperately googling”) for materials for my discussion of Sense and Sensibility for my Jane Austen Book Club tomorrow, I came upon a most delightful find: The Republic of Pemberley, advertised as “your haven in a world programmed to misunderstand obsession with things Austen.”

We, all of us, remember only too well the great relief we felt upon discovering this haven for Jane Austen Addicts. If your eyes did not widen, if you did not gasp in recognition, if you did not experience a frisson of excitement when you discovered a whole campful of soldiers — er — a whole websiteful of fellow Jane Austen Fanatics, then this place may not be for you. We are The Truly Obsessed here and have been known to talk for weeks about Jane Austen’s spelling quirks and Mr. Darcy’s coat (“No, no — the green one.”)

Among its treasures are “Bits of Ivory “— Jane Austen sequels by Pemberleans — and an advice column called “Lady Catherine & Co.” (Horrors!)

Given all the gar-BAGE on the Web, what a delight to find such a refined little corner.

maudnewton.com: RIP?

March 8, 2008

One of my favorite blogs has been hacked, perhaps fatally. It is a well-designed and well-maintained site, and represents hundreds of posts and eight years of work by one of the liveliest literary voices on the Web. I’m devastated on her behalf. Why would she be targeted? Is there any way for those who’ve created substantial content in a blog or a site to back-up their material? What could she and her Web host have done differently?

The Maytrees

February 29, 2008

8b85_7.jpgI write and edit for a living. Have for years. Most of it is a combination of flackspeak and journalism, short and sweet, avoiding the hyperbole that my client base always wants. I like to imagine I’m channeling Hemingway as I slash away at bloated copy and reduce an item to its essence. (Think the Associated Press Handbook, not the Chicago Manual of Style.) But I occasionally get to write something I’m proud of, something I’ll return to and read and rearrange and tweak and massage just a little. “No good writing, just good rewriting,” I remind myself. Yep, yep. I can do that.

It’s usually at this point that I’ll pick up and read something that smacks me in the forehead and makes me realize I am a hopelessly illiterate hack who should trash her word processing software before she does any more damage to herself or the English language. Annie Dillard’s little burnished diamond “The Maytrees” is my latest lesson in humility. I have a copy of her much-acclaimed and Pulitzer Prize-winning “Pilgrim at Tinker Creek” sitting in one of my to-be-read piles scattered around the house — so many books, so many more distractions — so this was our first encounter. Read the rest of this entry »

What I’m reading now

February 6, 2008

21jdfhl6gl_aa115_.jpgI stumbled upon Denise Mina quite by accident, er, Amazon. I’d ordered and read a couple of Minette Walters’ mystery fiction, and trusty Amazon popped up with several recommendations, including Mina’s previous books, The Dead Hour and Field of Blood. (Okay, I succumbed to some shameless marketing. Sue me.)

This series features Paddy Meehan, Mina’s not-quite-likeable heroine who is scrabbling after a career as a newspaper writer in the uber-macho world of Glasgow. I’ve been to Glasgow, and was quite taken by its grey, grubby, hung-over, working-class charm. Nay, this isn’t your Masterpiece Theater Scotland, but it has its own energy. After some encounters with unsavory types, several high-speed chases and some brushes with death in the last book, Paddy had managed to solve the case, scoop her rivals and — SPOILER ALERT — get herself knocked up, quite a dilemma for even a not-so-good Catholic girl.

At the end of the book, I had one of those wonderful “turn-the-page-OH-NO-where’s-the-rest-of-the-story?” moments. Mina set us up but good, but my patience has paid off and I will find how she deals (or in Paddy’s case, doesn’t) with her problems.

One of the things I love about good crime and mystery fiction is how authors manage to balance the character development of their major players against the unfolding of the story. Those characters, their strengths and, better yet, their weaknesses, should add to or be revealed by that tension. Mina’s Paddy, with her messy life and stubborn will, is a great one.

Early Austen

January 23, 2008

poster_northangerabbey_play.jpgNorthanger Abbey, which was entirely new to me, is a mere bauble compared to Jane Austen’s later works. In her intro to the PBS adaptation Sunday, a thoroughly Anglified Jillian Anderson pointed to its being Austen’s first novel, written at 23 and sold to a publisher for ten pounds — and promptly put on a shelf.

Austen seemed to intend it to be a send-up of the overwrought Gothic novels that were so popular in her day (and that she undoubtedly read). But it so clearly establishes the themes of Austen’s later works: romantic love, duty to one’s family, class structure and the myriad entanglements of money. Young Catherine may be confused about everyone’s motives, but we aren’t, or shouldn’t be: Income is all.

As Stephanie Cootnz reminds us here, romantic love as a basis for marriage is a recent phenomenon:

Marriage became the main way that the upper classes consolidated wealth, forged military coalitions, finalized peace treaties, and bolstered claims to social status or political authority. Getting “well-connected” in-laws was a preoccupation of the middle classes as well, while the dowry a man received at marriage was often the biggest economic stake he would acquire before his parents died…Until the late 18th century, parents took for granted their right to arrange their children’s marriages and even, in many regions, to dissolve a marriage made without their permission.

I used to accuse my mother of paying my husband to marry me. (They both denied it.) Two hundred years ago, it wouldn’t have been very strange.

A novel future?

January 22, 2008

According to this in the NYTimes, the Japanese may be pointing the way for the evolution of the novel: the cellphone novel, a largely feminine phenomenon:

Of last year’s 10 best-selling novels, five were originally cellphone novels, mostly love stories written in the short sentences characteristic of text messaging but containing little of the plotting or character development found in traditional novels. What is more, the top three spots were occupied by first-time cellphone novelists, touching off debates in the news media and blogosphere…

Here’s how it works:

One such star, a 21-year-old woman named Rin, wrote “If You” over a six-month stretch during her senior year in high school. While commuting to her part-time job or whenever she found a free moment, she tapped out passages on her cellphone and uploaded them on a popular Web site for would-be authors… After cellphone readers voted her novel No. 1 in one ranking, her story of the tragic love between two childhood friends was turned into a 142-page hardcover book last year. It sold 400,000 copies and became the No. 5 best-selling novel of 2007…

I wonder what it says about our attention spans? And if the authors hew to the minimalism used by most texters, the novels would be positively Hemingwayesque. (And the spelling!) Read the rest of this entry »

Literary wallpaper

January 17, 2008

I’m crazy about this decorating idea. (Via) I have an office at home (complete with a nameplate swiped from a previous job). Almost as soon as I got it all set up, the goons camped out in there and claimed the computer for several years. I’d come home and find the small room draped with hulking, hairy young men in cargo shorts and flip flops screaming at the screen. But they’ve all graduated and moved on, so it’s mine again — although I’m still pulling out tracts from World of Warcraft from every possible niche. I have my office back, but I miss the noise.

Persuaded

January 16, 2008

persuasion.jpgIt’s bitter cold here, but I am warmed at the prospect of a Jane Austen overload, which began Sunday on PBS with the first of a series of Austen adaptations, Persuasion.It is interesting that the producers chose to begin the series with Austen’s final novel, which speaks of a change in the British caste system brought about by the realm’s success in the Napoleonic wars. After earning his reputation and fortune at sea, Ann’s Captain Wentworth could finally thought to be worthy of her — although we and Ann knew he was all along. 

 I love this story, and I loved this setting of it. It speaks of second chances and the unchanging nature of love and hope. ”The one claim I shall make for my own sex,” Ann tells Captain Benwick, “is that we love longest, when all hope is gone.” 

That Ann, beyond all hope at 27, could break through the selfishness of the people surrounding her to find and claim her future is so compelling. Perhaps it speaks of Austen’s state of mind as she moved into her late 30s and on to her death at 41. Always hope — for something better, for a resolution, for the knitting up of loose ends. The film was all muted colors and misty British air, dim closeted rooms and pale faces.

While I liked the 1995 film version (especially the brooding Ciarán Hinds as Wentworth), I hated its portrayal of Ann’s family as slap-stick caricatures. In the PBS version, they were cloying, narcissistic snobs, which is probably more of what Austen had in mind. (And we wonder why she hated Bath…) 

I chose this novel for my turn at our Jane Austen Book Club.  Up next on PBS: Northanger Abbey.

The Joys of Sue Grafton

January 15, 2008

trespasscov1.jpgI admit I was particularly pleased to open a Christmas package from my spouse that contained Sue Grafton's latest, T is for Trespass. Despite a childhood spent literally camped out in the city library waiting for copies of the Nancy Drew mysteries to show up, I'm admittedly a newcomer to crime and mystery fiction. (I'm waiting for a long convalescence to start in on Agatha Christie.) But I'm catching up — I've preordered Denise Mina's latest, I never miss "Mystery" on PBS, and I've inhaled all the previous installments in Grafton's alphabetical series.

What is it about her plucky little heroine, the dogged, unassuming Kinsey Millhone? No family, no mortgage, no investments (other than that tidy, meticulous bank account), no insurance — and then there's that odd selection of geriatric friends and protectors. While I might be worrying about her prospects, she isn't.

T is for Trespass serves up perhaps Grafton's darkest perpetrator yet: the sociopathic chameleon Solana Rojas, who, as a home health nurse with stolen credentials, preys on the old and the ill, including Kinsey's neighbor. While Grafton grounds her series in the late '80s, sans computer and cell phones, the theme seemed eerily relevant: Who is watching out for the weakest among us? For me, her examination of Rojas and the system she so easily exploits makes this Grafton's most mature book yet.

I love Grafton's attention to detail — the peanut butter and pickle sandwiches, Kinsey's index cards, the eccentric menus at her favorite dive, the rambling only-in-California layout of Santa Teresa. I find that kind of writing really satisfying. It's a great afternoon read.

Rethinking Thin

January 14, 2008

Rethinking ThinI admire Gina Kolata’s writing. She’s a science writer for the NYTimes, and has a load of books to her credit, so I spent a little time this weekend skimming Rethinking Thin (2007), her examination of the current “obesity epidemic.” She spends a good deal of time recapping two studies (one short-term, one long-term) aimed at comparing (and, initially, debunking) some of the popular diet programs, in particular the Atkins low-carb regime. The short-term study, to everyone’s surprise, showed that the Atkins diet was more successful and didn’t elevate everyone’s bad cholesterol, as had been predicted. The study sparked a massive spike in interest in and adherence to the Atkins program (our house included). A second, longer-term study (two years) was initiated to try to verify the results of the first, and Kolata set out to document that study. The results could not have been more unpredicable — to Kolata, maybe, but not to the millions of us who have been on the diet treadmill for most of our lives.

 No one [writes Kolata] could have been more determined than the dieters in the [second] study. They committed themselves to a two-year program. They kept food diaries. They exercised. They worked on avoiding thoughts and feelings and situations that tempted them to eat. And yet, as happens to dieters time and time agin, most ended up gaining back almost every pound so painfully lost.        

At the final meeting for the study, Kolata writes, most of the dieters didn’t even show up. The bittersweet lesson?

 In the end, the lesson is, once again, that no matter what the diet and matter how hard they try, most people will not be able to lose a lot of weight and keep it off. They can lose a lot of weight and keep it off briefly, they can lose some weight and keep it off for a longer time, they can learn to control their eating, and they can learn the joy of regular exercise. Those who do best seem to be those who learn to gauge portions and calories and to keep their housers as free as possible of food they cannot resist. The effort, the lifelong effort can be rewarding—people say they feel much better for it. But true thinness is likely to elude them…        

This exchange made me particularly crazy:

I told a skinny friend about the dieters I had been following and the sad, but predictable, outcome of their attempts to lose weight. “Did they really really try?” he asked. I drew in my breath. It was like a slap. “Yes, of course they really, really tried,” I said.        

Yes, thin people everywhere, we really, REALLY try. As a lifelong dieter who believes she has actually dieted herself into obesity (every success eventually ended in failure—and an extra 10 pounds), I am really angry about the current obesity focus. I find television shows like “The Biggest Loser” and “Fat Camp” humiliating. (Why do they make those people wear BICYCLE SHORTS?) And the segments on obesity surgery make me want to weep. Some of them actually border on mutilation. I fervently hope we’ll be able to look back some day on these public displays of obese people and compare them to medieval torture. (“What WERE we thinking?”) Perhaps, Kolata suggests, we need to reexamine the entire paradigm:

 What, then, is wrong with this picture? Some scientists, including obesity researchers Jules Hirsch and Jeff Friedman, suggest an intriguing hypothesis. The origins of people’s recent weight gains may hive little to do with their current environment or with their willpower or lack of it, or with today’s social customs to snack and eat on the run or with any other popular belief. Instead, they say, we may be a new, heavier human race and our weight my have been set by events that took place very early in life, maybe even prenatally… Maybe something happened early in life—better nutrition, vaccines to provide freedom from viral infections that plagued children of previous generations, antibiotics to cure infections like strep throat or pneumonia—that precipitated changes in the brain’s control over weight… Higher weights could be an unintended consequence of the nation’s generally better health, or maybe even a contributor to it.        

 For another rebuttal of the obesity crisis, go here.