Archive for the 'Family' Category

Book bonding

April 2, 2008

images.jpeg Rachel Donadio, in a recent NYTimes article, makes the case for literature being a possible deal-breaker when it comes to relationships:

Anyone who cares about books has at some point confronted the … problem: when a missed — or misguided — literary reference makes it chillingly clear that a romance is going nowhere fast. At least since Dante’s Paolo and Francesca fell in love over tales of Lancelot, literary taste has been a good shorthand for gauging compatibility. These days, thanks to social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace, listing your favorite books and authors is a crucial, if risky, part of self-branding. When it comes to online dating, even casual references can turn into deal breakers.

The Spouse and I bonded early on a love of Shakespeare, despite an on-going argument about it being great theatre or great literature (he would win, of course, but Will is still a damn good read). Our tastes have kind of diverged from there, his to a diet of Stephen King, Orson Scott Card and Frank Herbert and the like, mine to a lot of non-fiction, mystery novels and works by women. We’ll occasionally exchange titles, but we certainly don’t base our relationship on books in common.

Marco Roth, an editor at the magazine n+1, said: “I think sometimes it’s better if books are just books. It’s part of the romantic tragedy of our age that our partners must be seen as compatible on every level.”

In point, one of Donadio’s literary interviewees has a partner who doesn’t read at all: “When she wants to talk about books, she goes to her book group.”

I’m just happy he reads. In fact, he probably spends more time reading than I do. Our sons hardly read at all, which makes me feel guilty (I just couldn’t read The Cat in the Hat for the 400th time) and I’m finding that a lot of their generation doesn’t read, either. It takes too much of their time.

What I’m reading now: It’s a toss-up between an early Denise Mina crime novel and The Madwoman in the Attic, a critical examination of 18th century woman writers (for my Jane Austen Book Club). I frequently read two books at once.

What gets read at your house?

Senior childcare

April 1, 2008

I dashed over to Costco during my lunch hour to pick up some prescriptions (my co-pay was $170 — Yikes!) and was surprised to see at least four older men and women (65+) who had very young children with them, clearly caregivers. One older couple had two very lively little boys that were almost too much for them to handle, especially in a store with so many distractions. 

I’m not sure what I think about that. I was fortunate to only work part-time when my children were very small, and I was grateful to my mother and in-laws when they watched my children for me, but it wasn’t a regular thing. I used daycare and preschool, even when we were in Chicago and had to drive miles to get to them. I recognize there can be extenuating circumstances, such as single parenthood and unemployment, that can make childcare a real financial drain. But is it fair or even appropriate to ask older parents to take on a second career as a parent?

 I marvel at stories of grandparents who, when their children stumble or fall, take on the care of their grandchildren, with great personal satisfaction. In some cultures, grandparents do a great deal of the child-rearing, and I’m sure everyone benefits. 

The old joke says that the reason why women over 50 don’t have babies is that we’d forget where we put them. (I’ll pause here for laughter…) I have a new little granddaughter that I dearly love, and I’m looking forward to the day when she can come to our house to play while her parents are gone. But I’m not sure I’m equipped physically or mentally to do it on a full-time basis. Any thoughts?

The final competition

April 1, 2008

images-1.jpeg Michael Kinsley muses on growing older in an interesting essay in the New Yorker. (Via.)

Between what your parents gave you to start with—genetically or culturally or financially—and pure luck, you play a small role in determining how long you live. And even if you add a few years through your own initiative, by doing all the right things in terms of diet, exercise, sleep, vitamins, and so on, why is that to your moral credit? Extending your own life expectancy is the most selfish motive imaginable for doing anything. Do it, by all means. I do. But for heaven’s sake don’t take a bow and expect applause.     

Boomers, he claims, have made everything a competition: He who dies with the most toys — or biggest house, smartest children, fanciest car, etc. — wins. And, he claims, it would seem that we’ve added longevity to that list, even though, outside of the usual healthy living practices, we have precious little to do with how long our run on earth continues.

The oldest boomers, born in the late nineteen-forties, are just turning sixty, and the last boomer game is about to start—the game of competitive longevity. So how are you doing? Let’s say you’re sixty. To begin with, you’re still alive, which gives you a leg up. Or are the real winners in our youth-obsessed generation the boomers who died young, like John Belushi? Well, perhaps, but you’ve missed that boat. There may be glamour in dying in your early twenties. There is no glamour in dying in your late fifties.     

And, he claims, the competition will get even fiercer:

The last boomer competition is not just about how long you live. It is also about how you die. This one is a “Mine is shorter than yours”: you want a death that is painless and quick.     

I once read a really fascinating book, How We Die, written by a Sherwin B. Nuland, M.D. The bottom line? The romantic ideal of dying a “good death” will be the gift to a very few. Death is for the most part a messy and painful business, and we should try really hard to minimize the messiness and pain for those we love and hope and pray they’ll do the same for us. Period.

Kingsley received a diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease at a relatively young age. “Sometimes,” he says, “I feel like a scout from my generation, sent out ahead to experience in my fifties what even the healthiest boomers are going to experience in their sixties, seventies, or eighties.” He’s clearly benefitting from some new therapies, but the progression of the disease will be slowed, not stopped.

I’ve already heard from several midlife friends who have developed serious illnesses or conditions and are feeling absolutely BETRAYED by their bodies. “How could this happen?” they say. “I’ve taken such good care of myself!” And I’m taking a lot more medications than I thought I ever would and am regularly peering into the mirror, looking for that next basal cell carcinoma. 

More importantly, from reading the blogs and talking with my friends, it seems that most of us midlifers are currently dealing with aging parents and other relatives, easing their transition into what comes next. And, most powerfully, we are ultimately teaching our children and their generation how to deal with us when that time comes.

In this sphere, I hope we will be remembered for our compassion, not our competitiveness. 

Visiting

February 11, 2008

images-11.jpegMy mother, in an uncharacteristic burst of charity, once wished for me as many “women-friends” as she had enjoyed. She had a lot of them, I know, because as a little girl I would be dragged along with her when she went “visiting.” In our age of cell-phones, text messaging, twittering, video phones blah blah blah, this practice of actually driving or walking to someone’s house for an extended, sit-down, face-to-face conversation has almost disappeared. But it was an important ritual for my mother and her friends.

Mother would bring her knitting to Hazel Harris’ house in Provo, having likely bought the yarn at the store where Hazel worked. (I would spend most of each visit unsuccessfully trying to ignore Hazel’s facial tic.)  Mother and her friend Beulah Phipps would often give each other home permanents in Beulah’s tiny house in a shabby subdivision built in the ’40s for the steelworkers and their families. And Mother and Joey Maag would sometimes can peaches or tomatoes at Joey’s house in Pleasant Grove before Joey went blind. But most of the time they would sit there in their handmade housedresses and cross-stitched aprons, drinking coffee when Mother still drank coffee and Postum when she didn’t, and would just visit — about their children, their spouses, their lack of money, their neighbors, Church, all the small things that made up their lives.

I hated these visits on several levels. As a child, I had an embarrassingly active sense of smell, and their houses, with their strange combinations of hand lotion, laundry soap and food smells, were often almost intolerable. The ammonia odor of the hair permanent solution at the Phipps house would make my eyes water. On one visit in Price, the hostess had had a small fire in the kitchen, and I spent the whole visit sitting on her front porch because the smell in the house made me gag. Mother was mortified, but spent her requisite several hours visiting anyway. I spent the time dreaming of being home with my dolls and stuffed animals, making up stories about them. Read the rest of this entry »

Literary wallpaper

January 17, 2008

I’m crazy about this decorating idea. (Via) I have an office at home (complete with a nameplate swiped from a previous job). Almost as soon as I got it all set up, the goons camped out in there and claimed the computer for several years. I’d come home and find the small room draped with hulking, hairy young men in cargo shorts and flip flops screaming at the screen. But they’ve all graduated and moved on, so it’s mine again — although I’m still pulling out tracts from World of Warcraft from every possible niche. I have my office back, but I miss the noise.